T
Width: px
Height: px
Height: px
ony Affigne came to Providence as a student at Brown University and became active because he believed politics should belong to ordinary people, not just the men who already knew how to move power around a room. By the time he entered public life, South Providence was full of working people, immigrants, Black and Hispanic families, tenants, organizers, and young people trying to make sense of a city that too often made decisions without us. Affigne did not see politics as something distant, but he saw it as something personal. It was about who got heard, who got ignored, and who was expected to wait their turn.
When Affigne entered Providence politics in 1982, he did so as an outsider by design. A Brown University graduate student and community organizer, Affigne was already active in neighborhood and tenant organizing in Providence when he entered the Ward 3 City Council race as an independent. He was not running through the Democratic machine, nor was he interested in doing so. His campaign was rooted instead in the belief that local politics had become too insulated from the people most affected by it—working-class residents, tenants, immigrants, and communities of color whose concerns were often discussed in City Hall but rarely shaped there.
Tony’s candidacy came two years after Manuel Rivera, a Puerto Rican Democrat, who entered local politics in June 1980. Rivera was the first Latino candidate to enter Rhode Island’s electoral field and Affigne the second. Though they ran in different contests and from different political positions, their candidacies marked a significant moment in Rhode Island politics: for the first time, Latino candidates had entered the electoral field and made themselves visible in a state where Latino communities had long been politically present but rarely represented on the ballot.
He ran for Providence City Council in Ward 3 as an independent in a political culture still dominated by party loyalty and incumbency. In that race, he lost to Democratic incumbent John Brennan, who held the seat comfortably as Democrats maintained control across much of the city. But Affigne’s campaign signaled something beyond the result. His candidacy offered an early challenge to the city’s entrenched political structure and gave shape to a different kind of local politics—one less tied to party machinery and more directly accountable to neighborhood concerns.
Affigne’s campaign focused less on electoral ritual than on political access. He spoke openly about the limitations of a city government in which power often moved through party channels before it reached the public. He argued that too many Providence residents—particularly poor and working-class residents, Black and Latino families, tenants, and young organizers—were expected to wait their turn in a political system that had little intention of making room for them.
Tony’s candidacy came two years after Manuel Rivera, a Puerto Rican Democrat, who entered local politics in June 1980. Rivera was the first Latino candidate to enter Rhode Island’s electoral field and Affigne the second. Though they ran in different contests and from different political positions, their candidacies marked a significant moment in Rhode Island politics: for the first time, Latino candidates had entered the electoral field and made themselves visible in a state where Latino communities had long been politically present but rarely represented on the ballot.
He ran for Providence City Council in Ward 3 as an independent in a political culture still dominated by party loyalty and incumbency. In that race, he lost to Democratic incumbent John Brennan, who held the seat comfortably as Democrats maintained control across much of the city. But Affigne’s campaign signaled something beyond the result. His candidacy offered an early challenge to the city’s entrenched political structure and gave shape to a different kind of local politics—one less tied to party machinery and more directly accountable to neighborhood concerns.
Affigne’s campaign focused less on electoral ritual than on political access. He spoke openly about the limitations of a city government in which power often moved through party channels before it reached the public. He argued that too many Providence residents—particularly poor and working-class residents, Black and Latino families, tenants, and young organizers—were expected to wait their turn in a political system that had little intention of making room for them.
I intend to run for governor until I win the governor's office. Now millionaires or people who have a million dollars to spend apparently can do that the first time around. Maybe (Tony Affigne) is going to have to do it more than once.
Tony Affigne, Independent candidate for Governor
By 1986, Affigne had carried that critique into a statewide race when he became the first Latino to run for Governor. Running on the Citizens Party ticket, he positioned his campaign as a challenge to the narrow terms of mainstream political debate. His platform addressed economic inequality, corporate influence, militarism, and the failures of both major parties to respond meaningfully to the needs of ordinary Rhode Islanders. That challenge became most visible when Rhode Island’s televised gubernatorial debates moved forward without him.
In October 1986, WPRI-TV and WSBE-TV announced they would limit their gubernatorial debates to the Democratic and Republican nominees, excluding Affigne and independent candidate Robert J. Healey Jr. of the Cool Moose Party. Both men objected. Affigne’s campaign argued that any candidate who had earned a place on the ballot had earned a place in the debate and that excluding independent candidates denied voters the full range of political choices before them.
The stations offered Affigne and Healey separate airtime outside the main debate format—either a joint half-hour segment or separate fifteen-minute appearances. Both campaigns refused. Healey called the arrangement “second class” treatment and said he would pursue a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. Affigne’s spokesman, Richard J. Walton, rejected the offer as well, saying it would relegate Affigne to “an exotic corner” of public television while the major-party candidates were given the main stage.
To Affigne, the exclusion was about more than airtime. It illustrated the larger problem his campaigns had been trying to expose: that political institutions routinely narrowed participation while presenting those limits as neutral procedure. Debate access, ballot access, and public legitimacy were not distributed evenly, he argued, and independent candidates were often treated less as legitimate contenders than as symbolic participants permitted only at the margins.
Tony never framed electoral politics as an end in itself. He spoke of campaigns as one part of a broader political project shaped by tenant organizing, antiwar activism, labor struggles, and neighborhood-based advocacy. Public office, in his view, mattered less as a destination than as a means of widening political participation and forcing institutions to answer to constituencies they had long ignored.
Whether running for Ward 3 City Council in 1982 or governor in 1986, Affigne’s campaigns reflected the same argument: that politics in Rhode Island had been too carefully managed for too long, and that democracy required more voices in the room than the established parties were willing to allow.
In October 1986, WPRI-TV and WSBE-TV announced they would limit their gubernatorial debates to the Democratic and Republican nominees, excluding Affigne and independent candidate Robert J. Healey Jr. of the Cool Moose Party. Both men objected. Affigne’s campaign argued that any candidate who had earned a place on the ballot had earned a place in the debate and that excluding independent candidates denied voters the full range of political choices before them.
The stations offered Affigne and Healey separate airtime outside the main debate format—either a joint half-hour segment or separate fifteen-minute appearances. Both campaigns refused. Healey called the arrangement “second class” treatment and said he would pursue a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. Affigne’s spokesman, Richard J. Walton, rejected the offer as well, saying it would relegate Affigne to “an exotic corner” of public television while the major-party candidates were given the main stage.
To Affigne, the exclusion was about more than airtime. It illustrated the larger problem his campaigns had been trying to expose: that political institutions routinely narrowed participation while presenting those limits as neutral procedure. Debate access, ballot access, and public legitimacy were not distributed evenly, he argued, and independent candidates were often treated less as legitimate contenders than as symbolic participants permitted only at the margins.
Tony never framed electoral politics as an end in itself. He spoke of campaigns as one part of a broader political project shaped by tenant organizing, antiwar activism, labor struggles, and neighborhood-based advocacy. Public office, in his view, mattered less as a destination than as a means of widening political participation and forcing institutions to answer to constituencies they had long ignored.
Whether running for Ward 3 City Council in 1982 or governor in 1986, Affigne’s campaigns reflected the same argument: that politics in Rhode Island had been too carefully managed for too long, and that democracy required more voices in the room than the established parties were willing to allow.
As told to Marta V. Martínez
May 2023
© All Rights Reserved | Nuestras Raíces: Latino History of RI © | When using materials from this website, please acknowledge by stating the name of the URL of the webpage on which it is displayed. Citations should include full bibliographic information as follows: Courtesy of the Latino Oral History Project of Rhode Island, Providence, RI.
